.png)
50 Debate
Prompts for Kids
by Patrick Daley and Michael S. Dahlie
New York
Toronto
London
Auckland
Sydney
Mexico City
New Delhi
Hong Kong
S
C
H
O
L
A
S
T
I
C
B
P
ROFESSIONAL OOKS
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
Scholastic Inc. grants teachers permission to photocopy the designated reproducible pages from this book for classroom use.
No other part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the
publisher. For information regarding permission, write to Scholastic Inc., 555 Broadway, New York, NY 10012.
Many of the debates in this book have been adapted from Scholastic Action and Scholastic Scope. If you would like to order
class subscriptions to these magazines, call 1-800-724-6527.
Cover design by Josué Castilleja
Cover illustration by Stacey Schuett
Interior design by Daryl Hair
ISBN 0-439-05179-7
Copyright © 2001 by Patrick Daley and Michael S. Dahlie. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
Ready, Read, Debate!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
Using This Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
Using Debates to Build Vocabulary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
Graphic Organizers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
Debate Prompts
1.
Should animals be used to test new products?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
2.
Should cell phones and beepers be allowed in class?
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
3.
In disasters like the sinking of the Titanic,
who should be saved first?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
4.
Should beaches have rules?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18
5.
Should people be allowed to go barefoot anywhere they want?
. . . . . .
19
6.
Should gun makers pay the cost of gun violence?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20
7.
Should people lose their jobs if it helps the environment?
. . . . . . . . . .
21
8.
Should children be allowed to enter beauty pageants?
. . . . . . . . . . . .
22
9.
Should student athletes have to get good grades to play sports?
. . . . . .
23
10.
Should coats made with dog fur be against the law?
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
24
11.
Should boxing be banned?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
12.
Do police belong in schools?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26
13.
Should hunting be banned as a sport?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
14.
Should students get paid for attending school?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
15.
If you do the crime, should your parents do the time?
. . . . . . . . . . . .
29
16.
Should teen criminals be locked up in adult prisons?
. . . . . . . . . . . .
30
17.
Should you change the way you dress because
of what other people might think?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31
18.
Should businesses be forced to deliver to every neighborhood?
. . . . . .
32
19.
Should the government rate music?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33
20.
Are teen juries a good idea?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
21.
Is space exploration worth the money we spend on it?
. . . . . . . . . . .
35
Table of Contents
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
Table of Contents (continued)
22.
If you find $100, is it yours to keep?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36
23.
Some malls in America have banned teens. Is this fair?
. . . . . . . . . . .
37
24.
If you see someone cheating on a test, should you tell?
. . . . . . . . . . .
38
25.
Are teen curfews a good thing?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39
26.
Is year-round school a good idea?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40
27.
Should skateboarding be banned in public places?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41
28.
Should Olympic athletes be tested for drugs?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
29.
Should sports teams drop Native American names?
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
43
30.
Should celebrities be responsible for the products they endorse?
. . . . . .
44
31.
Should schools have dress codes?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45
32.
Should celebrities speak out on political issues?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
33.
Should kids have to address teachers as Ma’am and Sir?
. . . . . . . . . .
47
34.
Should laws be stricter for teenage drivers?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48
35.
Should the paparazzi be banned?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
36.
Do teens have too much to do?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
37.
If you find a historical treasure, does it belong to you?
. . . . . . . . . . .
51
38.
Should surveillance cameras be used in schools?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52
39.
Should moshing be allowed at concerts?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53
40.
Should school newspapers be censored?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
54
41.
Should paddling be used to punish students?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55
42.
Would you give up certain luxuries to save the environment?
. . . . . . .
56
43.
Should students have to do volunteer work to graduate?
. . . . . . . . . .
57
44.
Should schools named for slave owners be renamed?
. . . . . . . . . . . .
58
45.
Should doctors transplant pigs’ organs into human bodies?
. . . . . . . .
59
46.
Should male and female training in the military be separate?
. . . . . . .
60
47.
Should girls have their own schools?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61
48.
Should kids learn riflery in schools?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62
49.
Should the United States be the world’s police force?
. . . . . . . . . . .
63
50.
Should teens have their own credit cards?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
5
Not an Argument
Unfortunately, many of us confuse debating with arguing. And no wonder! Our most
public displays of debate—political debates—are rarely an exchange of ideas for the
purpose of refining one’s thinking. Ideally, debating is an open-minded, intelligent way
to explore a world filled with diverse viewpoints.
In the classroom, you can best instruct about this type of debate by regularly modeling
it, making sure to demonstrate your willingness to change your opinions as you gather
new information. For a simple debate exercise, you can complete the five-step process in
minutes. A more elaborate or complex debate may extend for weeks.
Debating teaches students how to investigate new ideas and develop critical
thinking skills, and opens their minds to different viewpoints.
Ready, Read, Debate!
Using Debates in the Classroom
Once considered the stuff of elite high schools, debates are finding their way into class-
rooms at all grade levels. And for good reason. The debating process teaches students
how to investigate new ideas, helps them develop critical thinking skills, and opens their
minds to different viewpoints.
Basically, when working with students, there are five steps to the debating process
that you will want to reinforce and model. Those steps are as follows:
Form
Form an initial opinion
Defend
Defend the position in a debate
Refine
Refine opinion through knowledge gained in the debate
Explore
Explore all sides of an issue
Gather
Gather information
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
6
Of course in this book you will find many debates which will spark new ideas and chal-
lenge existing viewpoints. But before you even consult the pages in this book,
you can
help students better prepare for debating just by turning to the books they are reading . . .
or have read long ago.
As a warm-up, bring out the children’s classic, Make Way for Ducklings. (Yes, even your
sophisticated middle-schoolers will see the debating value of this picture book when you
are finished.) Read the book aloud to students to refresh their memory of the tale. Then
introduce the debate question, “Should Mike have stopped the traffic to let the ducklings
cross the street?”
Instead of having students immediately vote yes or no, focus on exploring the differ-
ent sides of this question. (NOTE: It is extremely important for you to show that you are
always more interested in the process of forming an opinion than you are in the opinion
itself.) Why might someone say that Mike was right? Why might others think he was
wrong? Have students revisit the story to seek further information and clarification. Were
there stop signs or traffic lights on the street? How fast were the cars going? Were there,
in fact, many cars on the street?
Point out to students that they can look to most of the books they are reading indepen-
dently for good debate questions. And by the middle grades, students are capable of tak-
ing each step to a deeper level.
Use as an example the book Spirit Quest
by Susan Sharpe. In this book,
a young
Native American boy discovers more about his rich ancestry. Within the book there
are tons of debatable issues. But a real-world debate topic (which is found later in this
book) is “Should sports teams drop Native American names?” This debate takes on a
whole new significance when viewed through the eyes of William—the protagonist in
Spirit Quest.
The Reading Connection
Just Imagine
Critical thinking, thoughtful discussion, and informed, flexible opinions. What a
great process to teach students. What a great literacy skill to give our future
community leaders!
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
7
Whole-Class Discussion
You may simply pass out a debate and ask students to read the debate issue—both
sides—and then discuss in class. However, for a richer experience you may want to
preview the debate topic by just reading the title aloud. Then students can fill out the
first part of the Before and After graphic organizer found on page 13. This will allow
students to see how their opinion might change as they gather more information.
Shared Reading
Remember that you, the teacher, are the most valuable resource for modeling how one
goes about forming an opinion. To best do this, pass out a copy of a debate to each
student. As you read the debate to the students, use several “think alouds” to show how
your opinion is forming. Interjecting comments such as “Oh, I never thought of that.” Or
“That’s something I never thought of before.” This shows that you are an active,
engaged reader.
Independent and/or Paired Reading
There are times when you may want your students to work on the debates independent-
ly. This option allows students to practice their opinion-forming skills and strategies
from time to time. In paired readings students can work together (in pairs) to help each
other through the opinion-forming process. In either case, you may wish to have them
express their points of view in one or more of the following ways:
• Discussion: Tell students to be prepared to share their opinion about the topic.
• Writing: Debates naturally act as prompts for students to craft a written point of view.
Encourage students to clearly identify the reasons that have helped them form their
own opinion.
• Consider Other Viewpoints: A higher-order thinking response occurs when students
state the opinion of someone else—not their own. For example, encourage students to
think about what the opinion of the concert organizer might be regarding moshing, or
what the emergency room doctor’s opinion might be regarding the mandatory skate-
board helmet laws.
• Finding More Information: Some debates will naturally lend themselves to further
research. Assign some debate topics with this task in mind.
There are many ways that you can use the debates in this book. Students can
read them independently, or you can use them for a whole-class discussion or as
shared reading. Here are a few suggestions:
Using This Book
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
8
Debate
Prompt
Vocabulary
Words
Definition
Use this grid to pre-teach difficult words or to follow up on difficult words after
the debate has been discussed in class.You may also want to assign these words in
conjunction with the Learning New Words graphic organizer found on page 12.
Using Debates to Build Vocabulary
Should animals be
used to test new
products?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Should cell phones
and beepers be
allowed in class?
In disasters like
the sinking of the
Titanic, who should
be saved first?
Should beaches
have rules?
Should people be
allowed to go
barefoot anywhere
they want?
advocate (n.)
someone who strongly supports a cause
ethical
believing in and sticking to a value system of right and wrong
vaccine
a medicine that protects people from disease
ban
to not allow something
communicate
to express one’s thoughts through talking, writing, etc.
device (n.)
a machine or piece of equipment designed for a specific purpose
indestructible
something that cannot be destroyed
survive
to live through a dangerous event
voyage
a long journey, typically over a sea or ocean
dominate
to control by force
injure
to hurt oneself or another
ruin
to destroy or spoil
promote
to spread the word; to encourage others to join in
sole
the underside of the foot
violate
to break or disregard
misuse
to use incorrectly
sue
to use legal means to take action against another person or company
violence
acts that are physically harmful
consequence
the result of an action
environment
the land, air, and water within a given area
extinct
when all of a particular type of animal or plant dies out
contestant
a person who takes part in a contest
organizer
a person who runs or manages a group
participate
to take part in
coast
to make it through a situation with little trouble
despite
regardless of
struggle
to have trouble completing a task or goal
companion
a friend
coyote
a kind of wild dog that lives in the woods
loyal
to stay true or faithful to someone or something
endurance
the ability to make it through stressful situations—either mental or
physical
paralysis
the loss of the ability to move or feel part or all of one’s body
spectacular
fascinating and captivating
Should gun makers
pay the cost of gun
violence?
Should people lose
their jobs if it helps
the environment?
Should children be
allowed to enter
beauty pageants?
Should student
athletes have to get
good grades to play
sports?
Should coats made
with dog fur be
against the law?
Should boxing be
banned?
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
9
Debate
Prompt
Vocabulary
Words
Definition
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Do police belong
in schools?
Should hunting be
banned as a sport?
Should students
get paid for
attending school?
If you do the crime,
should your parents
do the time?
Should teen crimi-
nals be locked up
in adult prisons?
Should you change
the way you dress
because of what
other people might
think?
Should businesses
be forced to deliver
to every neighbor-
hood?
Should the govern-
ment rate music?
Are teen juries a
good idea?
Is space explo-
ration worth the
money we spend
on it?
If you find $100, is
it yours to keep?
Some malls in
America have
banned teens. Is
this fair?
If you see someone
cheating on a test,
should you tell?
beat (n.)
the area a police officer is responsible for
controversy
an argument or dispute
rowdy
wild behavior
endangered
on its way to becoming extinct
inhumane
cruel and brutal
tradition
something that is handed down from one generation to the next
dedication
willingness to spend time and energy on a given project
motivation
the reason or reasons that cause you to do something
sweatshops
factories where workers are treated inhumanely
contribute
to add to
partially
in part, not completely
sentenced
ordered by a judge to serve jail time or community service
commit
to do; to take part in
increase
to make greater, to make more likely to happen
reform
to change for the better
conference
a meeting
conform
to try to fit into accepted standards
shallow
lacking depth; superficial
crave
to have a strong desire for
discriminate
to treat someone unfairly based on unrelated factors
illegal
against the law
censor
to block out
regulate
to control
suitable
appropriate; correct for the situation
accused (n.)
defendant in a legal case
jury box
the area where jurors sit during a trial
justice
the system of laws in a community
astronaut
a person who travels in outer space
explore
to investigate
NASA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
convinced
believed strongly
decent
good
wad
a stack; a bundle
accompany
to go with
intimidate
to scare
privilege
honor
benefit (v.)
to receive help from
betray
to be disloyal
consider
to think about
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
10
Debate
Prompt
Vocabulary
Words
Definition
Are teen curfews a
good thing?
Is year-round school
a good idea?
Should skateboard-
ing be banned in
public places?
Should Olympic
athletes be tested
for drugs?
Should sports
teams drop Native
American names?
Should celebrities
be responsible for
the products they
endorse?
Should schools
have dress codes?
Should celebrities
speak out on
political issues?
Should kids have
to address teachers
as Ma’am and Sir?
Should laws be
stricter for teenage
drivers?
Should the
paparazzi be
banned?
Do teens have too
much to do?
If you find a
historical treasure,
does it belong to
you?
cruise
to roam around
focus
to concentrate on
institute (v.)
to put into place
alternate (v.)
to take turns
boost
to improve
session
period when schools are open
disrupt
to interrupt
necessary
needed
pedestrians
people who travel on foot
establish
to put into place
random
to not follow a pattern
sacrifice
to give up something you really want
enthusiastic
to be very excited about
offensive
insulting
uphold
to maintain
decision
a judgment or conclusion
endorse
to promote
exploit
to take advantage of
dilemma
a choice between two equal options
hinder
to prevent
mandatory
required
influence
to effect
obliged
required by a sense of duty
take a stand
to express an opinion in a public format
counteract
to work against
formal
proper
instill
to bring about
gradually
slowly
restrict
to limit
transport
to carry from one location to another
aggressive
strong-willed
annoying
something or someone that bothers or disturbs
aspect
one feature of a given situation
priority
something that is more important than other things
shelter
to protect
sufficient
enough
artifact
an object of historical interest
debt
money owed
sunken
dropped to the bottom of the ocean or other body of water
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
11
Debate
Prompt
Vocabulary
Words
Definition
Should surveillance
cameras be used in
schools?
Should moshing be
allowed at concerts?
Should school news-
papers be censored?
Should paddling be
used to punish stu-
dents?
Would you give up
certain luxuries to
save the environ-
ment?
Should students
have to do volunteer
work to graduate?
Should schools
named for slave
owners be
renamed?
Should doctors
transplant pigs’
organs into human
bodies?
Should male and
female training in
the military be
separate?
Should girls have
their own schools?
Should kids learn
riflery in schools?
Should the United
States be the
world’s police
force?
Should teens have
their own credit
cards?
install
to put in place
reduce
to lower
surveillance
to watch carefully over a wide area
common
to occur often
packed
filled to capacity
risky
potentially dangerous
conclusive
provides information that allows a conclusion to be made
inconsistent
to not follow along; to be contrary to
supervise
to oversee
esteem
to respect and admire
estimate
to approximate based on given information
severe
harsh
continuously
without interruption
pessimistic
negative
recycle
use again
compassion
feelings of sympathy
involve
to take part in
require
to make necessary
deserve
to earn something
honor
to respect
surgeon
a doctor who performs operations in a hospital
compatible
to work well with something or someone
function
to work properly
temporarily
for a short time
appoint
to name someone to a position or group
exclude
to keep separate
propose
to suggest
impression
a taste of; a suggestion
opponent
someone on the opposite side or team in a debate or argument
opportunity
a chance to do something
bear (v.)
to carry something
beef up
to strengthen; to improve
mixed message
a message with two or more conflicting points
abandon
to leave or give up on someone or something
horrifying
completely frightening
unthinkable
out of the realm of possibility
consumer
a person who buys things
convenience
ease of use
replace
to get another
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
12
You may come across some new words as you read this debate. Put each new
word in the graphic organizer below and fill in the information for each word.
(Be sure to include all words you see in boldface type.)
Learning New Words
Name
Date
Debate Topic:
Word
Sentence
My Definition
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
13
Sometimes people change their minds—or opinions. Does this ever happen to
you, too? Use the graphic organizer below to keep track of how your opinion
either changes or stays the same. Here’s what you do:
1. Read the Debate Topic title.Then fill in Part 1: Before.
2.When you have finished reading the debate, fill in Part 2:After.
3. In Part 3:Tell Why, explain your thinking.
Before and After
Name
Date
Debate Topic:
Before reading this debate, these are my
thoughts and opinions about the topic:
Part 1:
Before
Part 2:
After
Part 3:
Tell Why
After reading this debate, this is how my
opinion has gotten stronger:
After reading this debate, this is how my
opinion has changed:
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
14
In most debate issues, you will see reasons for or against the topic.
As you read
the debate, keep track of both sides by filling in the graphic organizer below.
Looking at Both Sides
Name
Date
Debate Topic:
For/Yes
Against/No
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ave you ever wondered how a company
knows that its shampoo won’t burn your
eyes? Or make your scalp break out in a
rash? Companies test their products before
they sell them. And a lot of these products are
tested on animals first.
Shampoo isn’t the only thing tested on
animals. Many medicines are also tested on
animals. Each year, American researchers use
more than 20 million mice, monkeys, rabbits,
and other animals in scientific tests. These tests
help make sure that products are safe. They
also help researchers find cures for diseases.
But many animals suffer or die during the
tests. Animal-rights advocates say this is
wrong. One group, called PETA (People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals), says that
animals have feelings—just like people. They
get hungry and thirsty. They feel fear and pain.
PETA thinks that all testing on animals
should stop. Others feel that it’s the only way
to fight disease and make safe products.
What do you think? Should animals be used
to test new products?
Hardly anyone dies of
smallpox, polio, or rabies
anymore.
Why? Vaccines
helped wipe them out.
And without
animal testing, we wouldn’t have
vaccines.
We need animal testing to find
vaccines and to let scientists try out
new medical techniques, such as heart
transplants.
Yes, it does hurt some
animals, but it saves thousands of human
lives.
And that’s really important.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should animals be used
to test new products?
1
Animals have feelings,
just like humans.
It’s
wrong when they die to
test our products—especially those that
have no real medical purpose.
Companies like The Body Shop are
developing new products without animal
testing.
Doctors and researchers should
stop all animal testing now.
It’s not fair
to put animals’ lives at risk for humans.
Scientists perform tests on animals every day. Some people think the tests are
cruel and painful.
What do you think?
Write Now: What is your point of view? Write a letter to the editor of your local
newspaper voicing your opinion.
H
Your Turn!
15
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ne of the problems with cell phones and
beepers is that they can be a major source of
distraction. There’s nothing worse than
someone’s cell phone ringing in the middle of
something important. And if the people
actually start talking, it’s even worse. This is
why many teachers are trying to ban cell
phones and pagers from school. They claim
the devices disrupt their classrooms and
totally blow their students’ concentration.
Worse, if they go off during a test, they can
really hurt someone’s grade.
But lots of people disagree. They say kids
need pagers and cell phones. Some kids have
to keep in touch with parents and work.
Rather than banning beepers and cell phones,
some say that school officials should just
make kids use them responsibly.
What do you think? Should cell phones and
beepers be allowed in class?
Banning cell phones is
totally unfair! Kids don’t
have phones and pagers for
fun.
They need them.
They have to be
able to communicate with their parents
and their employers—especially if there’s
an emergency.
Sure, kids should use their
phones and beepers responsibly. But that’s
different from banning them altogether.
Cell phones and pagers are here to stay.
Kids might as well learn to use them
responsibly while they’re in school.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should cell phones and
beepers be allowed in class?
2
What does a kid need a
cell phone for? If there’s an
emergency,parents can
always call the principal.
And students can
use a pay phone to keep in touch with
their employers.Or they can keep a cell
phone in their locker and check messages
between classes.The fact is,cell phones
and beepers are really just a way of
keeping in touch with friends and dates.
There are too many distractions in kids’
lives already.They don’t need another one.
Some teachers say cell phones and pagers should be banned from school. Other
people say kids need them.What do you think?
Talk About It: What is the strongest argument for allowing cell phones and
beepers in class? What’s the strongest argument against them?
O
Your Turn!
16
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hen the Titanic was built, everyone said it
was indestructible. But on the night of April
14, 1912, on its first voyage from England to
New York, the Titanic hit an iceberg and sank.
Of the 2,224 people aboard, only about 700
survived.
Many of the people who survived were
women and children. This was because male
passengers decided that women and children
should get into the lifeboats first. There were
many reasons for this. First, men believed that
women and children were weaker, and needed
to be helped. Second, they believed that the
lives of women and children were more
valuable. Finally, many men thought placing
women and children first was simply the right
and proper thing to do. “Women and children
first” is how they did everything.
Does this make sense? What if the Titanic
sank today? Do you think men should do the
same thing?
It’s a fact—women and
children are more valuable
to society than men.
Women are the ones who have children.
And children are the ones who keep a
family going.
So “women and children
first” isn’t just being nice. It makes
sense.
If the Titanic disaster were to
happen today, men should let women
and children go first.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
In disasters like the sinking of the
Titanic
, who should be saved first?
3
The whole idea of
“women and children
first” is an insult. In today’s
world, everyone is equal.
Women are
just as strong as men—they don’t need
men to save them.
Women can save
themselves.
Maybe children should go
first.
But if the Titanic disaster happened
today, women and men should get in the
lifeboats together.
Some people say that, in emergencies, women and children should be saved first.
Do you agree with this?
Write Now: Do you think “women and children first” is a good idea? Why or why not?
W
Your Turn!
17
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
o doubt about it, summer is meant for
kicking back and having fun. And there’s no
better place to chill out on a hot summer’s day
than the beach. In some parts of America,
though, the beach is becoming more and more
like school. No, there aren’t any classes. But
there are definitely a lot of rules.
On some beaches, for instance, there’s
absolutely no ball playing or boom boxes. On
others you can’t have dogs or fly a kite. And
at several beaches in California, you’re not
allowed to throw a Frisbee or use a beach
umbrella bigger than six feet around. If you
have an illegal umbrella, you get a ticket.
Some people think this is ridiculous. They
say the beach should be a place to get away
from the rules and regulations of everyday
life. Others say it’s about time beaches had
some restrictions. They say that with all the
loud music and objects hurtling through the
air, it’s impossible to relax and have fun.
What do you think? Should beaches have
rules?
Rules are a good idea.
Some beaches are so
crazy it’s impossible to
show up without getting injured.
And
on the quieter beaches, it just takes a
couple of guys with a football to ruin
everyone’s good time.
Rules give
lifeguards more power to make beaches
fun for everyone.
Without rules, the
loudest and most obnoxious people
would always dominate the beach.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should beaches have rules?
4
The beach is a place to
play, hang out, and have
fun. It is one of the last
places in this country where you can do
whatever you want without anyone
hassling you.
Making a lot of rules is just
another way to make life more
complicated.
The beach should be easy,
fun, and rule-free.
If people want peace
and quiet they should stay in bed!
Some people say that beaches should have rules. Others say that rules ruin
beaches.What do you think?
Write Now: Make a poster that lists rules you think a beach should have.
N
Your Turn!
18
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
verybody likes to go barefoot, right?
There’s nothing better than feeling cool grass
or smooth pebbles between your toes. Even
in cities, some people like it so much they go
barefoot all the time, and this trend is picking
up steam. There’s even a club to promote
going barefoot. It’s called the “Dirty Sole
Society” and has over six hundred members.
People in this club do everything without
shoes. They shop, work, and even go out to
eat barefoot.
But certain people aren’t so happy about
this trend. Lots of restaurant owners, for
instance, place signs on their doors saying
shoes are required. They say that bare feet
smell bad and “turn off” other customers.
Other people say going barefoot is
dangerous. They say barefooters can be
seriously injured if they step on glass, nails,
or other sharp objects. They also say bare feet
spread disease.
What do you think? Should people be
allowed to go barefoot wherever they want?
Barefoot people should
be protected! This is a
free country and if people
want to be shoeless, no one should stop
them.The idea that being barefoot is
unhealthy is just a myth.
And going
barefoot is no more dangerous than
anything else. Maybe the government
ought to pick up all that broken glass
rather than harass barefoot people.As
for people who think it’s disgusting, they
need to lighten up!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should people be allowed to go
barefoot anywhere they want?
5
Feet are dirty and they
stink. If people want to go
barefoot, fine. But they
should do it in their own homes and on
their own property and leave the rest of
us alone. Feet-people say their rights are
being violated with these laws. But
what about the right of people not to
see or smell people’s disgusting feet?
What good is the law if it doesn’t at
least protect us from that?
Some people think that going barefoot should be banned in certain places. Others
think that being barefoot should always be allowed.What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: Make a list of three reasons why someone would want to go
barefoot anywhere they want. Make another list of three reasons why someone would
not want to.
E
Your Turn!
19
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
t’s against the law to make unsafe products
in the United States. You can’t build cars with
bad brakes. You can’t sell food that will make
people sick. And you can’t make toys that are
dangerous to kids. So what about guns? Guns
kill people every day. Should they be
considered an unsafe product? Should the
gun makers be punished?
Many states and cities have decided that
guns are unsafe. And they are suing the
companies that make them. They say that a
gun is a product that leads to crime, injury,
and death. And they’re trying to get gun
makers to pay for the harm these weapons
have caused.
But gun makers say that guns are dangerous
only if people misuse them. They claim that
gun makers shouldn’t be held responsible for
the actions of criminals.
What do you think? Should gun makers be
held responsible for the results of gun
violence?
Gun violence is a big
problem in this country.
Someone needs to take
responsibility.
Gun makers make lots of
money from a product that leads to
terrible violence.
They should foot the
bill to fix the problem.
Gun makers
should be forced to pay for police and
hospitals.
And they should be required
to pay for the cost of installing safety
locks on all their guns.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should gun makers pay
the cost of gun violence?
6
People should be
responsible for their own
actions.
Gun makers have
nothing to do with how guns are used. If
criminals misuse a gun, it’s their fault—
not the gun maker’s.
Besides, things like
cars can be dangerous too.
But no one
wants to ban them.
And no one would
sue a car company if they were run
over.
Why should it be different for gun
makers?
Some people say that gun makers should be held responsible for gun violence.
Other people say this is unfair.
What do you think?
Write Now:
Imagine that you have lost a brother or sister to gun violence. Write a
letter to your state senator explaining your point of view on this debate.
I
Your Turn!
20
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hat would you think if someone told you
that an animal or a bird was about to become
extinct? You’d want someone to do some-
thing about it, right? But what would you
think if they told you that saving this animal
might cost your parents their jobs? Tough
question? Unfortunately, many communities
across the United States struggle with this
problem every day.
Many types of animals are in danger of
becoming extinct. Saving them sometimes
means closing the businesses that threaten
them. Or it means that new businesses can’t
be built on lands that house threatened
animals. And this leads to people losing jobs.
Environmentalists don’t want to see people
out of work. But they also say that nature has
to be protected. Other people say that it’s time
to put human beings first. They say they don’t
want to destroy the environment, but they
think that jobs are more important than
animals.
What do you think? Are endangered species
more important than jobs?
Endangered species
must be our first priority.
It’s unfortunate when
people lose their jobs, but it’s worse
when animal species become extinct.
The American wilderness is a national
treasure.
It belongs to everyone.
And
it would be sad to lose any part of it.
More important, the planet’s
environment is very delicate. Losing a
single kind of animal could have terrible
consequences.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should people lose their jobs
if it helps the environment?
7
It’s time to put people
first! People shouldn’t
lose their jobs because of
animals.
Sure, we should protect the
environment as best we can.
But saving
the environment should not put people
out of work.
Anyway, environmentalists
always exaggerate.
Lots of times
endangered species are just types of
bugs or weeds.
It’s bad enough to think
that an endangered owl might cost
people their jobs.
But bugs and weeds?
Of course the environment is important, but some say jobs are more important.
What do you think?
Find Out More: Make a list of jobs that may harm certain parts of the
environment.
W
Your Turn!
21
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
here’s a beauty pageant in town and a
friend convinces you to go. You think beauty
pageants are boring. But you go anyway,
because you want to see what the big deal is.
When you arrive at the contest, however,
you’re shocked because you discover that the
contestants are only six years old.
Every year, over 100,000 girls under the
age of twelve compete in beauty pageants in
the United States. Organizers of these
pageants say they teach young girls important
lessons that will help them later in life. They
say the girls learn about hard work, discipline,
and self-confidence.
Other people say that children should not
be put through the stress of beauty pageants.
They say that six-year-olds should not have to
worry about things like self-discipline or
being the most beautiful little girl.
What do you think? Should children be
beauty queens?
People who want to
stop these pageants
should lighten up.
Participating in beauty pageants is just
like playing Little League.
Beauty pageants
can teach a girl how to be self-confident
and a good sport.
More important,
they’re lots of fun.
Six-year-olds love
wearing glamorous dresses and fancy
hair styles.
And their parents and family
love to see them all dressed up.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should children be allowed
to enter beauty pageants?
8
All beauty pageants are
ridiculous, but these
pageants are the worst.
Teaching girls to compete over their
looks is wrong, especially when they’re
so young.
Little girls should learn to feel
confident about their abilities, not their
looks.
And who cares if a six-year-old
learns about discipline.
Six-year-old girls
should be having fun, not working.
Beauty pageants are not just a waste of
time.
They’re harmful!
Some people think girls should be in their teens before entering beauty pageants.
Others think it’s okay for these girls to be younger.
What do you think?
Talk About It: What is the minimum age someone should be to enter a beauty
pageant? Why?
T
Your Turn!
22
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
icture this: A good friend of yours has
always struggled in school. He’s a great guy.
But he has a hard time doing well on tests.
Despite his troubles in school, however, your
friend has a few things going for him. He
happens to be the very best hockey goalie in
the state. In fact, he’s so good, there’s a
chance he’ll go pro. There’s just one thing. In
the middle of his best season ever, when he’s
breaking every record in the book, the school
board passes a new rule. They say that if you
don’t have at least a “C” average, you can’t
play sports. Your friend’s average is a “D.”
Suddenly, he’s off the team. Is this fair?
Some school boards say it is and have
already passed rules like this. They say that
grades must come first. Others disagree. They
say that sports are healthy, positive activities
that should not be linked to grades.
What do you think? Should athletes with
bad grades be kicked off the “team”?
School is about learning.
Everything else should
come second.
It’s wrong
that kids can coast through school
without learning much.
This rule will
make kids work harder to get a good
education.
Anyway, it’s hard to become
a professional athlete.
People need
something to fall back on.
And even if
someone does go pro, they’ll still need
to know how to read and do math.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should student athletes have to
get good grades to play sports?
9
Sports and grades have
nothing to do with each
other. If a kid can become
a great athlete, nothing should stand in
the way.
And even if some kids have no
chance of going pro, they shouldn’t be
punished for their grades.
Think of
everything you learn from sports:
teamwork, fast thinking, discipline, and
other skills.
There are a lot of things you
need to know to survive in the world, and
you can’t learn them all from books.
Some say athletes should have at least a “C” average to play sports. Others say
this is too strict.What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: Imagine you are the star football player at your school. How
would you feel if you were kept out of the game until your grades improved?
P
Your Turn!
23
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
et’s say you’re at a department store look-
ing for a new winter coat. You see lots of
things you like. But there’s one coat that you
have to have. After a long talk with your
mother, she agrees to help you buy it. You’re
thrilled! There’s only one problem. When you
get home, you discover that the coat’s really
warm and snuggly collar is made out of dog
fur. What do you do?
Recently lots of people have faced this
situation. One company accidentally sold
coats with dog-fur collars. They thought the
fur collars came from coyotes. But they were
wrong. When they found out, they quickly
stopped selling the coats and gave people
their money back. They didn’t have to do
this—it isn’t against the law to sell coats
made from dogs. But some people think it
should be.
What do you think? Should dog-fur coats
be against the law?
Of course it should be
against the law.
A dog is
not a wild animal.
A dog is
a pet.
In many homes, dogs are like
members of the family.
They make good
companions, and they are loyal to
humans.
They should be treated with
respect.
Plus, the way the dogs are
killed is horrible.
They are suffocated or
drowned.
Wearing dog fur is totally
wrong!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should coats made with
dog fur be against the law?
10
What’s the difference
between a dog and any
other animal? People wear
coats made from foxes.They wear
snakeskin boots.
And people eat all
sorts of animals.Why not use a dog to
make a coat? It’s ridiculous to say it’s
okay to kill one animal and not another.
Anyway, a lot of dog fur comes from
China, where most dogs aren’t pets.
Some people say making coats from dog fur is cruel. Others say dog fur is just
like any other fur.What do you think?
Write About It: Write an e-mail message to your senator explaining either why dog
fur coats should be outlawed or why they should be kept legal.
L
Your Turn!
24
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
oxing is a one-of-a-kind sport. It’s an excit-
ing, physically challenging test of
endurance, and a spectacular one-on-one
competition. Boxing is also a major money-
maker. Some boxers make $10 million for
just one fight. And television stations and
arena owners make even more. Why? Lots of
people love boxing, and they’re willing to
pay big money to see it.
But recently, some people have tried to
make boxing illegal. They say that boxing is
much too dangerous and that it leads to
terrible injuries like brain damage and
paralysis. They also say boxing
desensitizes people to violence by turning
fighting into a sport.
But other people say that the government
should not make boxing illegal. They say that
if two people want to box, then no one should
be able to stand in their way.
What do you think? Should boxing be
banned?
Ban boxing for good!
It’s just too dangerous.
Ask Evander Holyfield.
Mike Tyson bit off a piece of his ear in a
boxing match.
And what about Gerald
McClellan? This former boxing champ
was beaten into a coma at the age of
twenty-seven. Now he’s brain-damaged
and blind.
Dog fights and rooster fights
are illegal in America.
It’s about time we
stop human fights too!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should boxing be banned?
11
Boxing may be risky, but
this is a free country.
If
people want to step into a
boxing ring, no one should stop them.
Besides, more people are hurt or killed
every year in other sports, including
football and auto racing.
No one’s trying
to ban those sports.
If you don’t like
boxing, don’t watch it.
But don’t ban it.
Some people say boxing is too dangerous. Others say it is no different from any
other sport.What do you think?
Find Out More: Take a poll of five people. Are they for or against a boxing ban?
B
Your Turn!
25
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
olice officers around the country have a
new beat. It’s called public school. Counties
in more than forty states now have police
officers patrolling their school grounds. It’s
one of the many ways schools are trying to
stop violence. But the presence of cops in
schools is causing controversy.
People in favor of police officers in schools
say the cops prevent violence. A kid is less
likely to start a fight if a police officer is
there. And if there’s an emergency, there is
someone there who is trained to handle it.
Also, people think having a police officer
around makes kids feel safer.
But other people think having cops in
school is a terrible idea. They say it will make
kids feel like school is a dangerous place.
They also claim that the police officers will
make kids feel like they are in prison.
What do you think? Should we have cops in
our schools?
Public schools aren’t
what they used to be.
There’s a lot of violence
now.
If having police officers in the
schools puts an end to that, then they
should be in every school.
Besides,
we’ve been told our whole lives that
police officers are our friends.
Why
shouldn’t they “be our friends” in school
as well?
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Do police belong in schools?
12
Are you kidding? Just
because a few school
hallways are a little rowdy
at times, it doesn’t mean we need police
guarding the place.
Police make
students feel uncomfortable, too.
School is a place to grow and learn how
to think.
You don’t need armed guards
to help you do that.
Trouble in schools? Some say that police are the answer.What do you think?
Talk About It: Would you feel safer if there were police in your school? Why or why
not? What do your friends think?
P
Your Turn!
26
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
very year about 14 million Americans go
hunting. They shoot at bear, moose, prairie
dogs, and even pigeons. Some of these
animals become food. Some are stuffed for
trophies. Others are sold for their skins.
In recent years, however, hunters have been
the ones under attack. Hunting seasons have
been shortened. Land has been placed off-
limits for hunters. And certain animals have
been declared endangered, which means no
one is allowed to kill them. Why? Many
people say hunting is cruel and inhumane.
These people also say that hunting destroys
the environment.
Hunters say that they’re just doing what
people have always done. They say hunting is
an American tradition and that no one has the
right to tell them to stop. Many hunters also
say they need to hunt because it provides food
for their families.
What do you think? Should hunting be
banned?
Very few people hunt
because they need to feed
their families.
Today,
people don’t even need to eat meat at
all.
Besides, hunters often shoot at
animals that they aren’t allowed to hunt.
In Colorado, hunters are allowed to
shoot at elk, but not moose.
But they
keep shooting the moose anyway.
It
would be better if they weren’t allowed
to hunt at all.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should hunting be
banned as a sport?
13
Why is a hunter’s bullet
any more cruel than a
mountain lion’s fang?
Every animal survives by eating living
things, whether it’s plants or animals.
Besides, in some states, people have to
hunt and store food for the winter.
There’s a reason why the moose is the
most hunted of all animals in the state
of Alaska.
One moose can supply more
than five hundred pounds of meat!
Some people think that hunting should be banned. Other people disagree.What
do you think?
Find Out More: Research what kinds of animals are hunted in your state. When
are they hunted and for how long?
E
Your Turn!
27
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
t’s 7:00
A
.
M
. and you’re not sure if you’re
well enough to go to school. You’re not quite
sick, but you think you might have a cold.
Maybe just a little cold. Maybe only the snif-
fles. So you tell your mom that you should
definitely stay home—just to play it safe. The
next thing you know, she’s handing you your
lunch and pushing you out the door.
Sound familiar? It’s not like this for
everyone. In some schools across the United
States, kids will do anything to not miss a
single day of school. And there’s a reason for
this dedication. At their schools they get paid
for good attendance!
Many people are trying to stop this. They
say kids shouldn’t be paid for attending
school. They say this is nothing more than
bribery. Others say that if getting kids to stay
in school is so important, then paying them is
an idea that could work.
What do you think? Should kids be paid for
good attendance?
For some students,
school is really hard.
Every day is a challenge.
We need to do everything we can to
keep them in school.
Paying them can
prevent them from dropping out.
Also,
good attendance leads to good grades.
That’s worth whatever it costs.
If we
need to pay kids to do better in school,
we should. It will be worth it in the end.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should students get paid
for attending school?
14
Is this a joke? Students
should not be bribed to
attend school! There are
tons of kids around the world who are
working in sweatshops.
Give them the
education that paid kids are too lazy to
get on their own.
School is a place
where you learn how to deal with the
future.
If some kids don’t want to take
advantage of our free system—then tell
them to take a hike.
Some people say we should pay kids for showing up for school. Others say that
education should be the only motivation for going to school.What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: Ask two adults how they feel about this issue. Then ask two
kids. How are their opinions similar or different?
I
Your Turn!
28
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hen kids do things that are wrong, their
parents normally get angry. But they usually
don’t get sentenced or fined themselves.
Until now! Today, more than 35 states have
laws holding parents legally responsible for
their children’s actions.
In California, parents can be forced to pay
up to $25,000 to cover the cost of property
damage their children cause. In Oregon,
parents can be fined up to $1000 or be
ordered to attend parenting classes if their
kids commit juvenile crimes. Some states are
even cutting welfare payments if their
children miss school regularly.
But many people think these policies are
terrible. They say parents have some
responsibilities, but that the only person to
blame for a crime is a criminal. They also say
that the laws send a bad message to kids—it
tells them that they aren’t responsible for their
own actions.
What do you think? When teens commit
crimes, should their parents do the time?
Kids don’t just end up
bad.
They become
criminals because no one
has taught them right from wrong.
Sure,
there are lots of things that affect kids.
Schools, friends, society—all of these
contribute to how a kid behaves.
But
no one affects kids’ actions more than
parents.
If a kid ends up a criminal, the
parents are partially responsible.And
they should be punished.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
If you do the crime, should
your parents do the time?
15
This is ridiculous! Sure,
it’s important for parents
to raise their kids right.
But at a certain point all people have to
take responsibility for their own actions.
When kids commit crimes, they’re
responsible, not their parents.
Anyway,
parents don’t always have as much
control as you’d think. Good parents can
end up with a bad kid.They shouldn’t be
punished for that. It’s not their fault.
Some say that parents of young criminals should be punished. Others say their
child’s crime is not their fault.What do you think?
Talk About It: What do you think? Tell why it would be a good rule. Tell why it would
be a bad rule.
W
Your Turn!
29
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
o the crime, do the time!” That’s what
lawmakers around the country are saying to
teens who commit violent crimes. Currently,
there are about five thousand kids under
eighteen behind bars in adult prisons. And
soon there may be more. Congress wants to
pass a new law that would send teens as
young as fourteen to jail with adult criminals.
These lawmakers argue that sending teens to
juvenile prisons lets them off easy. They say
that only hard time in adult prisons will con-
vince a teen not to commit crimes.
But not everyone wants teen criminals to be
tried as adults. Many experts say that what
teen criminals need most is a chance to turn
their lives around. They say that adult prison
offers little chance for a teen to reform. They
only make young people more hardened and
violent.
What do you think? Do you think that teens
should be sent to adult prisons?
Kids who do adult
crimes should serve adult
time.
Juvenile sentences
are not tough enough for teens who
commit violent crimes like murder.
Violent criminals are dangerous and
should be locked up, no matter how old
they are.
To do anything else is not just
wrong—it’s dangerous.
The law needs
to crack down on teen crimes and make
our streets safe from gangs, guns, and
drugs!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should teen criminals be
locked up in adult prisons?
16
Kids who commit
serious crimes need
serious help.
They need
to be in rehabilitation or juvenile
detention where they can clean up their
act.
Locking kids up with adult criminals
only increases their problems.
They
don’t get the help they need.
Worse,
adult prisoners will often attack young
people in jail.
Adult prison is no place
for a kid.
Some say that teens who commit serious crimes should go to adult prisons.
Others say that teens need their own detention centers.What do you think?
Write Now:
You probably feel strongly about this issue. Share your opinion by
writing a paragraph explaining your point of view.
“D
Your Turn!
30
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
our parents have been complaining about
the way you dress. They say you can express
yourself, but that maybe you should tone it
down. Spiky hair is all right, but not all the
time. As for the nose ring—they can live with
it, but not at your grandmother’s birthday
party.
You’re sick of all these fashion rules and tell
your parents that how you dress is no one’s
business but yours. You have to be yourself.
A month later, parent-teacher conferences
roll around. You’ve been doing well this
semester, so you’re not sweating it. But when
you catch your parents heading off to the
meetings, you can’t believe your eyes. Your
mother is wearing a red mini-skirt and an
enormous blonde wig. Your father’s wearing a
gross Hawaiian shirt and torn shorts.
You’re furious! You say you’ll be the
laughing stock of the school; they tell you
they’re just being themselves.
What do you say now? Should you change
the way you dress because of what other
people might think?
It’s a fact:
People judge
you by the clothes you
wear.
Sometimes that’s
wrong.
But if you’re meeting someone
who doesn’t know you, they don’t
always have much to go on.
You may be
a great person.
But if you’re wearing a
shirt with a skull on it, someone might
find that frightening.
You don’t always
have to conform.
But sometimes it’s
best to dress according to the situation.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should you change the way you dress
because of what other people might think?
17
You should always be
yourself.
It’s as simple as
that.
If people are
shallow enough to judge you by the
clothes you wear, that’s their problem,
not yours.
Anyway, if your family and
friends really love you, they’ll get over
what might scare them at first.
Even
grandparents.
Probably half the stuff
kids do seems strange to grandparents.
But most of the time they manage to
love their grandkids anyway.
Should you wear what you want? Or should you wear what others think you
should wear? What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: What’s your view on this debate? Think about the other side
and defend it.
Y
Your Turn!
31
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
magine that you’ve been craving pizza all
day. Finally, once you get home, you call to
have one delivered. But the pizza company
says it won’t deliver to your neighborhood.
“A driver was robbed last week,” an employee
says. “You’ll have to pick up your pizza
here.”
Okay, so maybe you live in a high-crime
area. But you’d never rob anyone. Is the pizza
company being unfair? In San Francisco,
California, one lawmaker thinks so. Neither
Domino’s nor Mr. Pizzaman would deliver in
her neighborhood. So she took action. She
helped pass a new law that makes it illegal for
businesses to deliver to some neighborhoods
but not others.
Her opponents say this law is unfair. They
say it’s not Domino’s and Mr. Pizzaman that
are affected by this new law. It’s their
employees. It’s the drivers who now have to
risk their lives just to deliver pizzas
What do you think? Should businesses be
required to deliver to every neighborhood?
If living in a certain
neighborhood doesn’t
make you a criminal, why
should delivery services discriminate
against you? After all, delivery is
available to those who live in other
neighborhoods. If delivering pizzas is so
unsafe, pizza places shouldn’t deliver to
anyone.
Life is tough enough for good
citizens who live in areas with high
crime rates.
Don’t punish them for it.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should businesses be forced to
deliver to every neighborhood?
18
It’s easy for politicians
to talk about fairness.
They’re not the ones who
have to deliver pizzas to high-crime
neighborhoods.
Across the country,
pizza deliverers have been robbed,
attacked, and even murdered.
Doing
your job shouldn’t mean risking your
life.
Businesses should be able to make
their own decisions about where they
deliver.
A company has the right to
protect its employees.
One politician wants a law that forces businesses to deliver. But is she right or is
she making matters worse?
Consider Both Sides: If you were a delivery person, would you want to drive into a
high-crime neighborhood? What if you lived in that neighborhood? Would you expect
businesses to deliver to you?
I
Your Turn!
32
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
icture this: Your favorite music group
comes out with a new record. You’ve heard
that some of the lyrics might not be suitable
for kids, and your parents are pretty strict
about that kind of stuff. After talking it over
with them, however, they decide you can get
the album. But when you go to the store to
buy it, the store manager won’t sell it to you.
He says it’s illegal for you to buy it because
you’re too young. Your parents say it’s okay.
But the government says it isn’t. Who’s right?
Right now, there are no laws regulating the
sale of music to kids. Only music companies
rate albums. And music stores decide for
themselves who to sell them to. But some
people want the government to start rating
records. And they want the government to
make it illegal for young people to buy certain
kinds of music.
What do you think? Should the government
rate the music you listen to?
If record companies
rate their own music, who
knows what they’re going
to say? They’re only interested in
making a sale.
There is no way they are
going to give an honest review.
Anyway,
what difference does a label make if it
doesn’t stop a kid from buying a record?
Without government regulations, record
stores will sell whatever they can to
whoever wants to buy.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should the government rate music?
19
If the government starts
rating music, they’re saying
what people can and can’t
listen to.
That’s censorship and a
violation of the First Amendment! And
if they get away with censoring music,
it’s just a matter of time before they
censor television and books.
Kids and
their parents should have the right to
decide what music kids listen to.The
government should stay out of it!
Some people say that the government should rate music. Others say ratings hurt
free speech.What do you think?
Talk About It: Poll other students in your class. Have they ever bought CDs that
their parents might not have wanted them to buy? What happened?
P
Your Turn!
33
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
icture this: You’re on a field trip to the
town courthouse. While you’re there you get
to meet many important people: a judge,
lawyers, and even the mayor. Then your
teacher says you’re going to watch a real
trial. But when the trial begins, and the jury
walks into the jury box, you discover that the
jury is made up of kids your own age!
Surprised? Believe it or not, these trials are
happening all across the country.
Right now, there are more than 200 youth
courts in 25 states. In youth courts, young
people are tried by juries of other young
people. The juries can give sentences of
community service. They can also
recommend that the accused go to counseling.
But there is one thing that the teen juries can’t
do—they can’t send kids to jail.
Many people think youth courts are a great
way to involve kids in the justice system.
Others say kids are too young to hand out fair
sentences.
What do you think? Are youth courts a
good idea?
Youth courts work! The
statistics speak for them-
selves: Only 25 percent of
kids sentenced in youth court commit
crimes again.
That’s much less than in
regular court.
Plus, youth courts may
prevent kids from committing crimes in
the first place.
Why? No one wants to
go on trial in front of their friends. Youth
court also lets kids see how courts work.
By serving on juries, they get a firsthand
understanding of American justice.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Are teen juries a good idea?
20
What? These kids are
still in school. How could
they know enough to be
on a jury? This has nothing to do with
rights.
You need experience and wisdom
to be in a courtroom.
Anyway, what kid
is going to take a youth court seriously?
Being sentenced by other kids isn’t
scary.
This is just another way of letting
people who commit crimes off easy.
If
they do a real crime, put them in front
of a real jury.
In courts around the country, kids are judging other kids. Is this a good idea?
Talk About It: If you were a juror on a teen jury, do you think you would be easier or
harder on the defendant than a regular judge? Why?
P
Your Turn!
34
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
our best friend wants to be an astronaut.
She’s really smart and she talks about space
all the time. One day she tells you that NASA
is sending a robot to Mars. She says it costs a
lot of money. But she also says it’s worth it
because of the ways it will help science. You
agree. Your friend makes it all sound so excit-
ing. But the very next day your school
announces that, due to government budget
cuts, it is dropping the school orchestra and
football team. The principal says the school
can’t afford them. How do you feel now?
Every year, NASA spends about 14 billion
dollars on space exploration. Many people
feel this is a waste. They say this money
should be spent on things here on Earth, like
hospitals and schools.
Other people think space exploration is
worth the money because it creates jobs and
contributes to science.
What do you think? Is space exploration
worth the money?
Space exploration is
worth every penny.
It’s
not just a question of
learning about the universe.
Space
exploration creates jobs and improves
lives.
Many of today’s new products are
a direct result of space exploration.
Space exploration has even led to
important medical discoveries.
Who
knows what else we will find out there?
We have to keep exploring space!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Is space exploration worth
the money we spend on it?
21
Put first things first!
There are too many
problems here on Earth
to worry about what’s in space.
Science
is important.
And everyone wants to
know more about the universe.
But
what do you tell people who don’t have
enough food? When everyone has
enough to eat and can afford to see a
doctor, then we can go into space.
Until
then, we should wait.
Some say space exploration costs too much. Others say it’s worth it.What do
you think?
Consider Both Sides: Think of all the things that the government spends money
on. List three things that are more important than space exploration. List three
things that are less important.
Y
Your Turn!
35
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
here’s a citywide bike race coming up and
you’re the best biker around. You’re definitely
faster than the kids in your neighborhood and
probably faster than the ones in the city.
There’s only one problem. You’re bike is old
and starting to fall apart. You’re convinced
you need a new one to win the race.
Then something crazy happens. You’re in
the park one day and you spot something.
When you check it out, you discover it’s a
wad of cash that totals $100. You can’t
believe it. With what you’ve saved already,
it’s enough to help you buy a decent bike.
Your troubles are over! Or so you think.
Pretty soon you start to feel guilty. You
think maybe you should tell someone. And
you imagine how unhappy the person who
lost the money must be. You really want a
new bike. But could you live with yourself if
you kept the money?
What would you do? Would you try to give
the money back?
Giving the money back
is the only thing to do.
Everyone could use extra
cash.
And it would be tempting to keep
it.
But if it’s not yours, you should turn
it over to the police.
Anyway, everyone
would want to know where the money
came from.
You’d have to explain
sooner or later, and then some people
might be disappointed in your decision.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
If you find $100,
is it yours to keep?
22
Are you kidding? Take
the money and run!
Anyone irresponsible
enough to lose all that money doesn’t
deserve it.
Or they’re so rich, they don’t
care.
This is a dog-eat-dog world.You
have to take what you can get.
Sure it’s
sad that someone lost all that money.
But it would be just as sad if you had to
give it back.
The best thing to do is keep
quiet and enjoy your good luck.
Some people would keep the money. Others would try to give it back.What
would you do?
Consider Both Sides: What if you lost money? Would you want someone to return
the money? Would you understand if someone did not want to return it?
T
Your Turn!
36
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
t’s Friday night and you’re going to a birth-
day party. But you don’t have a present yet,
so you and a friend make a quick trip to the
mall. But when you arrive, a security guard
tells you to leave. You tell him you haven’t
done anything wrong, but it doesn’t matter.
The mall has ordered a ban on teens!
This is really happening in Bloomington,
Minnesota. Bloomington’s Mall of America
recently banned kids under sixteen after 6:00
P
.
M
. on weekends, unless an adult
accompanies them. Mall officials took this
drastic action because store owners and
customers complained that most kids were
disruptive. They said teens roamed around in
packs and intimidated people. Many other
malls are considering bans as well.
But some say bans like this are unfair.
Opponents of the bans say they discriminate
against a whole group of people just because
of a few troublemakers.
What do you think? Is a mall ban fair?
Lots of kids go to malls
just to cause trouble.
Bans
are a good way to keep
these kids under control.
Also, malls are
private property.
That means they don’t
have to let in kids if they don’t want to.
Besides, kids spend too much time at the
mall as it is.
They should be doing
something productive rather than
wandering around malls all day.
Going to
malls is a privilege, not a right.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Some malls in America have
banned teens. Is this fair?
23
This is a violation of
kids’ rights! Kids spend
money at malls just like
everyone else and they’re entitled to
equal treatment.
Also, malls have
replaced the downtown area in many
communities.
Kids don’t have other
places to go.
Anyway, it’s unfair to
punish all kids just because some of
them cause trouble.
There are other
ways to deal with troublesome kids
besides a ban.
Teens say going to the mall is a right. But some malls say it’s a privilege.What do
you think?
Talk About It: If malls aren’t allowed to ban teens, what can malls do to control
teen problems at the mall?
I
Your Turn!
37
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ou know cheating is wrong. And you’d
never consider doing it. But what would you
do if you caught someone else cheating?
It would be a pretty easy question if
someone stole your homework. You’d
probably tell your teacher. And if someone
was selling answers to a test, you’d probably
report it too. But what if you caught a
classmate taking a look at your answer sheet
during a test. Then what?
You don’t want to betray a classmate, who
could get into a lot of trouble. You also don’t
want to be known as a rat. But you studied
hard for this test. Why should this kid benefit
from your hard work? Plus, if you don’t tell,
you might get in trouble. If your teacher
found out, he might think you were in on it.
How would you handle it? If you saw a
classmate cheating, would you tell your
teacher?
Turn the cheater in!
Cheating is totally unfair.
Why should some kids
work hard just so other kids can steal
their answers? There should be no free
rides. If students want good grades, they
should earn them, just like everyone
else.
Besides, cheaters need to be
stopped for their own good.
It may
seem like nothing now, but eventually
cheaters will wish they learned more in
school.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
If you see someone cheating
on a test, should you tell?
24
Don’t be a rat! Cheating
is not right, but kids should
learn to solve their own
problems rather than always running to a
teacher.
It’s much better to talk to your
classmate yourself.
If you catch someone
looking at your work during a test, let the
person know you noticed and want it to
stop.
If it doesn’t, then think about telling
the teacher.
But until then, you should
handle the problem on your own rather
than being a tattletale.
Some kids would tell a teacher if they saw someone cheating. Others would keep
quiet.What would you do?
Write Now: Write one reason why you should tell the teacher about a cheater.
Write one reason why you might not.
Y
Your Turn!
38
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ou’re at a friend’s house practicing for the
school play. You have a lot of lines to learn
and the play is in a few days. But you’re a
hard worker. And you’re a good actor. And
your friend is willing to stay up late working
with you. There’s just one problem. Your
town has a curfew. You have to go home
early.
All across America, towns are instituting
curfews for kids. Of the country’s 200 largest
cities, 146 already have curfews. Many of the
cities report drops in their crime rate as a
result. These cities also say that with curfews
in place, fewer kids are victims of crimes.
But some people want to end these curfews.
They say they are a violation of kids’ rights,
especially since some kids have to stay out
late because of school activities and jobs.
What do you think? Are curfews a good
idea?
Everyone always talks
about kids’ rights.
What
about the right to feel
safe? Cities with curfews have less
crime.
This makes life better for
everyone.
Anyway, why do kids need to
stay out late? They should be home
doing their schoolwork instead of
cruising around.
A curfew will help
kids focus on what’s important and
keep them out of trouble.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Are teen curfews a good thing?
25
Curfews are wrong,
wrong, wrong! If you had
a curfew for adults, there’d
be less crime too.
But no one’s trying
to keep adults at home at night.
Why
should kids be treated differently from
adults? Besides, lots of kids need to be
out late.
They have school activities and
jobs that end late.
We should find other
ways of reducing crime.
Some people say that kids should be home at a certain time. Other people say
curfews violate kids’ rights.What do you think?
Find Out More: What are some things, instead of curfews, that cities and towns
can do to prevent problems?
Y
Your Turn!
39
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hat did you do on your summer vacation?
About 5 percent of U.S. school kids today
could not answer that question. Why? They
go to school year-round.
These days, year-round schedules are
increasingly popular. Some schools lengthen
the normal 180-day school year in order to
improve the students’ education. Other
schools are in session 180 days a year, but
scatter three-week vacations throughout. And
other schools teach kids in alternating
shifts—that means some kids have their
summer vacations in the middle of winter!
People who support year-round schooling
say that kids learn more that way. They say
kids don’t forget what they learn over a long
summer break, and teachers spend less time
reviewing old material.
Opponents say that year-round schooling
does little to boost learning. They say it takes
away a very important rest period for kids and
increases student and teacher burnout.
What do you think? Is year-round schooling
a good idea?
Summer vacation is
nothing more than a
chance for kids to forget
everything they’ve learned.
Worse, it’s a
chance for them to get into trouble.
Kids have too much free time as it is.
They don’t need three months with
nothing to do.
Year-round school
improves a kid’s education, and gives
students something productive to do
over the summer.
Keep them in school!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Is year-round school a good idea?
26
For most kids, summer
vacation is a much-needed
break.
But that’s not to
say they aren’t productive.
They play
sports, go to camp, and participate in
things they can’t do during the school
year.
More importantly, summer is the
best time for kids to get jobs.
Most kids
have to work for their spending money
and to save for college.
If you keep kids
in school all summer, you’ll cut off their
chance to earn money.
Some people say kids should go to school year-round. Others say that’s too much
work for kids.What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: What are three positive things about year-round school?
What are three negative things?
W
Your Turn!
40
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
t’s Saturday afternoon. You and your friends
head to the park to ride your skateboards. But
when you arrive, a police officer stops you.
She says skateboarding has been banned in
the park and tells you to leave.
These days, lots of skateboarders are
finding themselves without a place to skate.
Cities and towns across the country have
banned skateboarding in public places. Many
skateboarders think these bans are unfair.
They say that skateboarding should be treated
the same as any other sport. They also
complain that there aren’t many other places
for kids to skate. Most communities don’t
have skateboarding parks.
City officials say the bans are necessary
because skateboarders disrupt traffic and
bother pedestrians. They also say that
skateboarding is extremely dangerous. Every
year, thousands of skateboarders injure
themselves and others while skating in public
areas.
What do you think? Should skateboarding
be banned in public places?
Skateboarders have no
respect for other people.
They cut off cars, bump
into people, and clog up sidewalks.
Skateboarding is also dangerous.
Skaters can seriously injure themselves
as well as other people.
Worse, if
skateboarders hurt themselves on
public property, they could sue.
Local
communities just can’t take that risk.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should skateboarding be
banned in public places?
27
Skateboarding is no
more dangerous than
anything else.
Many more
people get hurt on bikes every year and
no one wants to ban them.
Anyway,
with practice and the right gear,
skateboarding is safe.
Also, if kids can’t
skate in public places, where can they
skate? People should realize that
skateboarding is just another way for
kids to get exercise and have fun.
Some say skateboarding in public places is dangerous. Others say it’s not only fun
but a right.What do you think?
Write Now: Make a list of three points that the two sides of this debate might
agree on.
I
Your Turn!
41
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
aster, higher, stronger” is the Olympic
motto. Some Olympic athletes will do any-
thing to run faster, jump higher, or be
stronger. Lots of times this means hard work,
discipline, and sacrifice. Other times, it
means breaking the law. Some athletes take
performance-enhancing drugs, like steroids,
to improve their chances in a competition.
The International Olympic Committee
believes that drug use goes against the spirit
of the Olympics. Because of this, they have
established a drug-testing program. Every
athlete who competes is tested at least once,
and then may be subjected to more random
tests later.
But some people think it’s the drug tests
that go against the spirit of the Olympics.
They say Olympic officials have become
police officers and that the tests are an
invasion of privacy. But they say the worst
thing is that sometimes the tests can be
wrong.
What do you think? Does drug testing at
the Olympics make sense?
Drug use among top
athletes has long been a
problem.
Without drug
testing, Olympic competition would be
about who uses the most drugs, not
about who trains hardest and has the
best athletic skills.
Athletes who use
performance-enhancing drugs are like
marathoners wearing in-line skates.
In
other words, using drugs is the same as
cheating.
Plus, drugs like steroids can
kill.
Drug use has to be stopped.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should Olympic athletes
be tested for drugs?
28
Any athlete who tests
positive for drugs is
banned from the games.
Drug tests are usually accurate.
But
sometimes they show a positive result
even when an athlete is only using
something like allergy medicine.
When
that happens at the Olympics, an
innocent athlete is cheated out of the
dream of a lifetime.
That’s not fair.
Unless the tests are foolproof, they
shouldn’t be used.
Some say that Olympic athletes should be tested for drugs. Others say this is a
bad idea.What do you think?
Talk About It: How would you feel if you found out that your Olympic hero had won
because of performance-enhancing drugs?
“F
Your Turn!
42
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
magine you’re in charge of a famous sports
team. The team has a colorful history and
thousands of enthusiastic fans. Then one day
someone tells you that your team’s name is
offensive. They ask you to change it. What
do you do?
A few years ago, the Miami Indian Tribe
asked Miami University of Ohio to change
its team’s name. The Miami Indians said the
name Redskins was insulting. Miami
University agreed and changed its name to
the Red Hawks. Other schools have done
the same.
But not all sports teams have been willing
to change. In Mukwonago, Wisconsin, for
instance, the high school refused to give up its
name Warriors. The administration said they
were upholding school tradition and
supporting the fans of Mukwonago High.
They also said that the name Warriors honors
Native Americans and the role they have
played in local history.
What do you think? Should sports teams
have to change their names?
Hello! Insulting a group
of people to protect a
sports tradition is
ridiculous! These names make people
feel bad and should be changed.
It’s that
simple.
Anyway, changing a team’s name
is not that big a deal. It’s not like it
would cause them to lose.
If the fans
are really loyal, they’ll keep coming to
games even after the team’s name has
changed.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should sports teams drop
Native American names?
29
Changing the names of
sports teams is unfair to
fans. Imagine supporting a
team for a number of years only to have
its name changed.
Sports traditions are
important and should be protected.
Besides, naming sports teams after
Native Americans is an honor.
If Native
Americans feel insulted by names like
Redskins and Warriors, they are being too
sensitive.
Many Native Americans think these names are offensive. Other people say Native
Americans are too sensitive.What do you think?
Find Out More: Make a list of all the teams that use Native American names. Can
you come up with other names to use instead?
I
Your Turn!
43
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
magine you’re a famous basketball player.
You play on a championship team, you’ve got
lots of fans, and, best of all, someone is pay-
ing you $10 million to put your name on a
pair of sneakers. Then one day you find out
the shoes you endorse are made by child
laborers. How would you feel? Would you
feel responsible?
A couple of years ago Michael Jordan and
Kathy Lee Gifford faced this very problem.
Some of Gifford’s line of clothes were made
by Honduran girls paid just 31 cents an hour.
And, according to news reports, some
sneakers that have Jordan’s name on them
were made by ten-year-old children in
Indonesia.
Many people are angry with Gifford and
Jordan for being involved with companies that
exploit children. Others aren’t upset. They
say that celebrities are paid to endorse just the
product—not the way it’s made.
What do you think? Are celebrities
responsible for products they endorse?
Celebrities have a lot of
power in this country.
People trust them and do
what they say.
They should be held
responsible for what they tell people to
do.
Anyway, celebrities make millions of
dollars endorsing products.
The least
they can do is make sure these products
aren’t made by children.
Celebrities
should use their fame to help people,
not just to make money.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should celebrities be responsible
for the products they endorse?
30
Every person is
responsible for his or her
own decisions.
If people
don’t like how a product is made, they
shouldn’t buy it.
Anyway, celebrities have
nothing to do with where a product
comes from.
It’s the companies that
make the products that are really
responsible.
Punishing celebrities will
not change anything.
If people want to
make a difference they should force
businesses to change.
If a celebrity endorses a product, should he or she be held responsible for how
it’s made? Some say yes. Others say no.What do you think?
Talk About It: Are you more or less likely to buy a product that was endorsed by a
celebrity? Tell why.
I
Your Turn!
44
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ow would you feel if you arrived at school
one day wearing the exact same outfit as every-
one else? For some kids this happens every
day. They go to schools where uniforms are
mandatory.
These days, more and more schools are
making students wear uniforms. How come,
you might ask. Well, teachers at these schools
say that uniforms help students to focus on their
studies—rather than on their fashion dilemmas.
They also say that uniforms “level the playing
field” among students from different economic
backgrounds. The stress of having the latest
clothes can be intense. And not all kids can
afford to keep up with the new fashions.
Other schools have refused to adopt
uniforms. These schools say that clothes offer
kids and teens a healthy way to be creative.
Clothes help kids express their individuality.
They also say that uniforms make students
uncomfortable, which makes it hard for them to
study.
What do you think? Should uniforms be
required at school?
Give us a break.
There’s
too much competition
over clothing in schools
today.
Kids should focus on their
schoolwork, rather than on appearances.
They should also be finding better ways
to express their individuality.
Choosing a
sweater to wear isn’t creative.
And
there are bigger problems associated
with clothes.
Gangs identify themselves
by certain colors and symbols.
School
uniforms get rid of this problem.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should schools have dress codes?
31
Are you kidding? Putting
on a tie doesn’t make
someone any smarter.
Uniforms only make kids uncomfortable;
they don’t turn kids into better students.
More important, uniforms hinder free
thinking and teach kids to conform.
The
solution to problems such as gang
violence is to encourage kids to think for
themselves, and to not follow the crowd.
Making kids wear uniforms teaches the
opposite lesson.
Some teachers say uniforms help students do well in school. Others say they spoil
kids’ creativity.
Who do you think is right?
Consider Both Sides: Why do you think some teachers would like dress codes for
students? Why do you think some parents don’t support dress codes?
H
Your Turn!
45
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
n 2000, Ricky Martin urged President
Clinton to halt military tests on an island off
Puerto Rico. Martin is just the latest celebrity
to take a stand on a political cause. U2’s
Bono has campaigned for international
human rights. The band Rage Against the
Machine has crusaded against censorship.
And Rosie O’Donnell has advocated
increased gun control.
Many celebrities feel they’re obliged to
speak out on important issues because they
can reach a large audience. They think they
should use their fame to do something good—
especially if it’s a cause they believe in.
But not everybody thinks celebrities should
take a stand on political issues. Critics say
that celebrities have far too much influence.
Critics also say that big stars often don’t know
what they’re talking about. They say that
singers and actors should leave political issues
for the experts to figure out.
What do you think? Should celebrities
speak out on political causes?
Celebrities have a lot of
power.
They should use it
to do good things.
Since
their fans and the press will care about
what they say, celebrities have a duty to
publicly express their beliefs.
Whether
celebrities like it or not, they are role
models.
They owe it to their fans to
show some leadership.
And they owe it
to the world to put their power to
good use.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should celebrities speak
out on political issues?
32
If celebrities want to be
role models, they should
work for charitable
causes.
Or they should donate their
money to political groups.
Too often,
celebrities get involved in things they
don’t know anything about.
And people
end up listening to them rather than
people who are truly experts on the
issues.
Anyway, lots of celebrities just
use political causes to improve their
own public image.
Some people think big stars should take a stand on issues. Others think they
should keep quiet.What do you think?
Find Out More: Make a list of celebrities who do speak out on issues. Have any of
these celebrities influenced your opinions?
I
Your Turn!
46
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
any educators and politicians in
Louisiana believe that students lack
respect for their teachers. To counteract this,
the Louisiana government has passed a law
requiring students to call their teachers
Ma’am or Sir. Each school is responsible for
punishing students who break the rule.
However, schools can neither suspend nor
expel these students.
Legislators believe this law will instill
discipline and respect in the classroom. They
say that this will lead to a better learning
environment. More importantly, they say it
will lead to safer schools. They claim that the
lack of respect for officials has contributed to
violent acts in school.
But opponents argue that respect is more
complicated than requiring formal titles for
teachers. They claim respect grows from
teachers and students working together, and
that rules handed down by the government
hurt this cooperation.
What do you think? Should students have
to call their teachers Ma’am and Sir?
By requiring students to
speak with courtesy to
their teachers, you’ll have
a better learning environment.
And isn’t
that the goal of school anyway? Only
when there is respect for teachers can
kids learn anything. If no one respects
the teachers, why would anyone listen
to what they have to say? In addition,
students who treat teachers with
respect will learn to treat friends and
future employers in the same manner.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should kids have to address
teachers as Ma’am and Sir?
33
What kids don’t need is
a law telling them how to
speak.
What’s next? A law
telling them how to think? Forcing kids
to use Ma’am and Sir doesn’t create
respect. It only drives kids and teachers
farther apart, when they should be
working as a team.
That’s where respect
comes from.
Students respect teachers
they trust and who provide help.
Some people say using these titles is a sign of respect. Others say this is ridicu-
lous.What do you think?
Talk About It: What’s your opinion on this issue? Discuss your point of view with
others in your class.
Your Turn!
M
47
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
icture this: It’s your sixteenth birthday, and
after years of waiting you’re finally old enough
to drive. But after studying hard and passing the
driver’s test, you find out that having a license
isn’t what you thought it would be. Your driving
privileges are totally restricted. You can’t drive
alone at night, or with other teens. Basically,
you discover that if you want to drive any-
where, you have to go with your mom!
Recently, teenagers around the country
have been having a similar experience. They
live in one of the 34 states that give teen
drivers “graduated” licenses. With this type of
license, you earn privileges gradually. In
California, for example, for the first six
months of having your license, you can’t
drive after midnight unless you have an adult
in the car. And you’re also not allowed to
transport other teens.
Many people think graduated licenses are a
good idea and that they’ll save lives. Other
people say that teens are being unfairly
targeted.What do you think? Should states
give teens graduated licenses?
Too many teens die on
the road! Thirty-one
percent of all deaths of
people between the ages of fifteen and
twenty-four are caused by motor-vehicle
accidents. Restricting teen driving
privileges will reduce this.
It might not
be the most popular solution.
But it’s
absolutely necessary.
Kids just aren’t
mature enough to handle an adult
license.
The numbers prove it!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should laws be stricter
for teenage drivers?
34
Why should teens be
discriminated against?
There are plenty of bad
adult drivers out there.
Why doesn’t
anyone restrict their licenses? Teens are
being unfairly picked on, and their rights
are definitely being violated.
And
graduated licenses will only cause
problems for kids that have to work
late.
Some people say that teen driving privileges should be restricted. Others say that
teen drivers should have the same rights as everyone else.What do you think?
Talk About It: Are teen drivers more likely than older drivers to make mistakes?
Are teen drivers more likely to break the law?
P
Your Turn!
48
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
n recent years, a whole new generation of teen
idols has hit the scene. People like Ricky
Martin, Mandy Moore, and Justin Timberlake
have all found fame and fortune in the world of
movies and pop music. Their lives have become
pretty exciting since they made it big. But there
is also a price to fame. And among the most
annoying aspects of celebrity are the paparazzi.
Paparazzi (pa-pa-ROT-zee) are photo-
graphers who make a living by selling
pictures of celebrities. The better and rarer the
picture, the more money they make. This is
why paparazzi will follow certain celebrities
everywhere. Most obey the laws. But some
will sneak into celebrities’ houses, stalk them
on the beach, and even chase them in cars.
Many people think the paparazzi ought to be
stopped. People say they violate celebrities’
right to privacy, and are also dangerous.
The paparazzi say they’re only giving
people what they want. They also say that
their work is what makes celebrities famous
in the first place.What do you think? Should
the paparazzi be banned?
Celebrities are people
too! They have a right to
privacy just like everyone
else.
The paparazzi violate this right and
they should be stopped. It might be
different if they weren’t so aggressive.
But they’ll do really dangerous things to
get the shots that sell for the most
money.
This is not about limiting
freedom of speech.
This is about
stopping greed and respecting privacy.
Ban the paparazzi!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should the paparazzi be banned?
35
The paparazzi are not at
fault.
They’re only giving
people what they want.
Celebrities benefit from lots of press
and the public loves the pictures.
Anyway, there are already laws in place
to protect celebrities from the
aggressive paparazzi—it’s already illegal
to sneak into someone’s house to take
pictures of them.
Why ban all paparazzi?
Just go after the ones that break the law.
Some people say the paparazzi should be banned. Others say that photographers
should be free to take pictures of whatever they want.What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: How would you feel if someone took a picture of you after
you asked them not to? Would you take a picture of a friend who told you not to?
I
Your Turn!
49
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ere’s a schedule you might recognize:
Wake up at 5:30
A
.
M
. Finish up homework.
Go to school for six hours. Head to sports
practice. Baby-sit or flip burgers until 8:00
P
.
M
. Go home. Wolf down dinner. Practice
piano. Do more homework. Hit the pillow at
midnight.
Too much? Some people think so. Parents
and teachers around the country are saying
that schedules like this are way too full for
young people. They say that without
sufficient downtime a teen’s physical and
mental health can be seriously damaged.
But other people say a busy schedule is
good for teens. They claim that keeping busy
teaches teens about the real world and
prepares them for the future. They also say
that having lots of activities keeps teens out of
trouble.
What do you think? Is it possible for teens
to do too much?
This has nothing to do
with laziness! This is
about priorities and
realistic expectations.
Teens are so busy
these days that they can’t focus on the
things that are really important—like
being healthy and happy! Good grades
are important.
So are sports and part-
time jobs.
But teens still need time to
relax and have fun, just like everyone
else.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Do teens have too much to do?
36
This is just another
argument in defense of
laziness.
It’s a hard world,
and the sooner teens accept this, the
better.
The more they work now, the
less difficult it will be for them to deal
with the stressful world of adults.
Life
isn’t going to get any easier. Sheltering
teens from hard work won’t help
anything.
People who think differently
are fooling themselves.
Some people say that teens have too much to do. Others suggest that busy
schedules prepare teens for the real world.What do you think?
Write Now:
How much do you do? Write a paragraph describing your own schedule.
Explain why you might want to add to or cut back on it.
H
Your Turn!
50
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ow would you feel if you went scuba-diving
and found sunken treasure—pieces of gold
from a lost Spanish ship? Probably pretty
excited. How would you feel if the coast
guard made you turn the treasure over to a
museum? You might feel kind of gypped. But
you also might feel good. Everyone would be
able to appreciate your discovery if it were in
a museum.
But how would you feel if finding the
treasure wasn’t an accident? What if you
were a professional treasure hunter? Many
professional treasure hunters, or salvors,
spend a lifetime looking for treasure that most
people don’t even believe exists. They study
old books and maps for years. They go into
debt. They even risk their lives. Now courts
are making them give what they find to
museums. The courts say that lost treasure is
historically important and belongs to
everyone.
What do you think? Should courts let
salvors keep the lost treasure they find?
Salvors do the work
and take the risks.
They
should get the rewards!
Most of the stuff they find would be lost
forever if it weren’t for them.
If they
can’t keep the treasure they find, they’ll
stop looking.
Anyway, when salvors sell
their treasure, they auction it off to the
highest bidder.
If museums want the
treasure, they can buy it just like anyone
else.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
If you find a historical treasure,
does it belong to you?
37
Treasure hunters need
to be stopped! Historical
artifacts belong to
everyone and not just to the first guy
who happens to find them.
And
museums are much too poor to buy the
artifacts at an auction.
Plus, treasure
hunters do a lot of damage.
They’ll stop
at nothing to get gold and silver.
They
often destroy historical sites and even
the environment because of their greed.
Some people say that sunken treasure belongs in museums. Others say that trea-
sure belongs to the people who find it.What do you think?
Consider Both Sides: Imagine that you are a treasure hunter who has just found
a valuable object off the U.S. coast. What would you say in a speech to congress?
H
Your Turn!
51
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hese days, you can find surveillance cam-
eras everywhere. They’re at the mall, on
street corners, and in libraries. Now, these
cameras may be coming to the classrooms
and hallways of your school. After the
tragedy at Columbine High School in 1999,
many schools across the country have been
increasing security. And this has included
placing surveillance cameras in school hall-
ways, parking lots, and even on buses.
Administrators think the cameras will
reduce theft, prevent violence, and identify
suspects in crimes. They also say security
cameras might even boost grades because
students work best in safe environments.
Other people say that cameras violate kids’
right to privacy. Furthermore, they claim that
cameras are a waste of money. For a single
school, installing a camera system can cost
almost $1 million. Many people think this
money would be better spent on educational
material.
What do you think? Should surveillance
cameras be used in public schools?
Schools can be
dangerous places.
School
officials need to do
whatever they can to keep students
safe—even if this means giving up some
freedoms.
Surveillance cameras are the
best way to catch criminals.
Better still,
they discourage people from committing
crimes in the first place.
Anyway, privacy
is not really endangered.
Tapes from
cameras are usually not even watched
unless a crime has occurred.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should surveillance cameras
be used in schools?
38
School safety is
important.
But it doesn’t
justify violating kids’ rights.
Besides, there are much better solutions
than cameras.
Why not take the money
for a new surveillance system and start
programs to help troubled kids.
One
million dollars could pay for job training
and after-school activities.
Catching
troublemakers in the act doesn’t solve
anything.
What kids need are reasons to
not start trouble in the first place.
Some schools are installing surveillance cameras to keep kids safe. But lots of
people say this is a bad idea.What do you think?
Write Now: Imagine surveillance cameras are used in your school. Do students and
teachers feel the same way about the cameras? Write a news story about
student and teacher reaction to the cameras.
T
Your Turn!
52
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
ou’re at a concert. The place is packed and
the music is loud. This is what you live for.
You make your way to the front of the crowd.
You know that the real action is by the stage.
But when you arrive, everyone is just stand-
ing around. No one is bumping into one
another. No one is crowd surfing or stage div-
ing. And then you see the big line of security
guards. At this concert, moshing is not
allowed!
This is a common story these days. Many
bands and concert promoters are saying no to
moshing. Why? Because unruly concerts can be
very dangerous. In the past five years, 49 people
have died and nearly 22,000 people have been
injured at concerts in the United States. The
moshing fad explains a lot of the injuries.
But for many music fans, not being able to
mosh takes the fun out of concerts. They also
claim moshing isn’t the problem and that it
shouldn’t be blamed when crowds get out of
control.
What do you think? Should moshing be
allowed at concerts?
No mosh, no fun.
Going to a concert
without moshing is like
going to a restaurant without eating.
Besides, moshing is not that dangerous.
It’s high-energy dancing.
That’s it.
There’s plenty of things that are much
more risky than moshing.
Like playing
football.
More kids get injured on a
football field than in a mosh pit, but no
one wants to ban football.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should moshing be
allowed at concerts?
39
Moshers are obnoxious
and really dangerous.
They ruin concerts for
everyone else.
You can’t get close to the
stage without someone jumping on you
or knocking you over.
And moshing
always leads to fights. Sooner or later,
someone gets pushed too hard and they
start punching.
Anyway, it’s not like
moshing is the only way to enjoy a
concert.
There are plenty of ways to
dance without hurting other people.
Some say moshing at concerts is dangerous. Others say it’s safe.What do you
think?
Talk About It: Would you be nervous at a concert where kids were moshing? Or
would you join in? What might you do to protect yourself?
Y
Your Turn!
53
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
icture this: You’re working on a story for
your school newspaper. You’ve done lots of
research, conducted interviews, and dug up
all the right information. After lots of careful
analysis, you finally come up with conclusive
proof: The cafeteria food is terrible! But just
as you’re about to publish your article, the
principal steps in. He says you can’t run the
piece. Why? Because he thinks it makes the
school look bad. Is this fair?
Many people say it is. They say school
newspapers are different from real
newspapers and that teachers have a
responsibility to supervise them. The
Supreme Court agrees. In 1988, it said, “A
school need not tolerate student speech that is
inconsistent with its basic educational
mission.”
Still, lots of people disagree with this. They
say that censorship is always wrong, even in
the case of a school newspaper.
What do you think? Should school officials
censor school newspapers?
Student journalists need
guidance.
They don’t have
enough experience to be
in charge of a newspaper all by
themselves.
They could say things that
are offensive or mean.
Worse, they
could write something that is false.
If
this happens and the story hurts
someone, the school will be sued, not
the reporter.
School newspapers are
just not the same as real newspapers.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should school newspapers
be censored?
40
Principals and teachers
have no right to censor
school newspapers—one
of the few places kids have to voice their
opinions.
If you censor the newspaper,
you tell kids they have no right to
express opinions.
Anyway, the main
reason schools censor their newspapers
is because they have something to hide.
With censorship, schools can do
whatever they want.
A free press holds
people responsible for their actions.
In schools all across the county, teachers and principals regularly censor school
newspapers. Do you think this is fair?
Consider Both Sides: Why might some people want school papers censored? Why
would others be against it?
P
Your Turn!
54
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
wo students get into a bad fight at school.
There’s a broken nose, two knocked-out
teeth, and a black eye. What should their pun-
ishment be? In some schools in the United
States, the punishment would be a “good old-
fashioned” spanking. Currently, 23 states
allow school officials to paddle students.
Some people estimate school officials paddle
kids between 1 and 2 million times a year in
U.S. schools.
Many people say this should stop. They say
that paddling increases, rather than reduces,
violence by teaching kids to use it to solve
their problems. These people also say that
paddling hurts a student emotionally. They
say spanking can ruin students’ self-esteem
and turn teachers into enemies.
But other people think that paddling is the
only way to teach students that their behavior
has real consequences. They say paddling is
far more frightening than detention.
What do you think? Should schools paddle
students to punish them?
Paddling may be a tough
punishment, but some
students just won’t listen.
Paddling is the only way to get through
to them.
Suspending students doesn’t
work.
It just gives them days off from
school.
Besides, kids are much better
off in the long run if they get paddled.
Severe punishment now means less
trouble later in life.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should paddling be used
to punish students?
41
Are you serious?
Paddling is cruel and
inhumane and should be
totally illegal.
It teaches students that
violence is a good way to solve their
problems.
What else is paddling but a
form of physical violence? Paddling is
also completely embarrassing and
damages the self-image of the student.
Schools should have other forms of
punishment.
Paddling should be banned!
Lots of people say kids should be paddled if they step out of line. Others say this
is wrong.What do you think?
Talk About It: What means of control, other than paddling, can teachers use in
the classroom?
T
Your Turn!
55
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
our dad is driving you crazy. It seems like
he doesn’t care about the environment at all.
He doesn’t recycle, he runs the air condition-
er continuously, and he puts chemicals on
the lawn. What’s worse, he laughs when you
tell him that these things harm the planet.
Then one day he tells you he has a surprise.
He says that he’s bought you an early birth-
day present. It’s a gorgeous, but gas-guzzling,
sports car.
Do you accept it? You know that cars are a
major source of pollution. And you know that
it’s important to conserve energy. Hello!
We’re talking about your very own car.
Whatever you decide, you can be sure that
you’re not the only one facing this problem.
These days, everyone struggles with the fact
that everyday products can damage the
environment. But what’s the solution? Should
people have to give up things they want and
need to save the environment?
People think that their
actions don’t matter, but it
all adds up.
When millions
of people run air conditioners and drive
cars alone, it wastes energy and pollutes
the air.
The environment must come
first.
It doesn’t matter what we have to
give up.
Anyway, what seems essential
often isn’t.
For instance, people can take
buses instead of driving.
Or, they can
wear lighter clothing instead of turning
on the air conditioner.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Would you give up certain luxuries
to save the environment?
42
People should relax and
stop being so pessimistic.
Earth has been around for
a long time.
Cars and air conditioners
aren’t going to destroy it.
Anyway, what
some call comforts and conveniences are
really necessities.
Imagine living in
Phoenix,
Arizona, without an air
conditioner, or in rural Nebraska without
a car.
Environmentalists should
understand that there are some things
people can’t live without.
Cars and air conditioners cause pollution. Some people say we should give them
up. Others say we shouldn’t.What do you think?
Write Now: Make a list of the things you enjoy that might be harmful to the
environment. Are there any you could use less—or stop using altogether?
Y
Your Turn!
56
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
omework, sports, friends, chores, some-
times even a job—it’s amazing that kids can
fit it all in. Well, guess what? Some sudents
have a new after-school responsibility—vol-
unteer work.
One teen works at an old-age home.
Another reads books to the blind. Other
students volunteer at a homeless shelter. Are
they doing it out of the goodness of their
hearts? Not really. They have to do it if they
want to graduate from school. Across the
country, students are being required to do
volunteer work to graduate.
Some parents and students think this is
unfair. They say that teens already have
enough to do. It’s fine if teens want to
volunteer, but they shouldn’t be forced to do
it. Others say it’s good for teens to do
volunteer work. Learning to help others is
educational.
What do you think? Should doing volunteer
work be a requirement to graduate?
Volunteering is great!
Every teen should become
involved.
When teens
work in the community, they learn things
they could never learn in the classroom.
Working at a homeless shelter or reading
to the blind teaches kids to appreciate
the good things they have in life.
It also
teaches them compassion.
Besides,
what could be more important than
helping other people? Volunteering is
important—and it improves your life.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should students have to do
volunteer work to graduate?
43
Having to do volunteer
work isn’t volunteering at
all.
Volunteer work should
not be a part of schoolwork.
Many
students don’t have time to volunteer.
They are too busy with homework and
activities.
There’s plenty of time to
volunteer once you’re an adult.
Besides,
there are lots of kinds of volunteering.
Many teens volunteer at home—
babysitting, cooking, and cleaning.
No
forced volunteering!
Some people think that passing all your classes is enough of a reason to graduate.
What do you think?
Write Now: Make a list of two to three places where you would like to be a
volunteer. What kinds of things could you do if you volunteered at these places?
H
Your Turn!
57
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
n the past five years, the school board in
New Orleans has changed the names of 22
schools. Why? Because the board opposes
schools that were named for anyone who did
not respect equal rights for all.
The problem is that some of these schools
were named for some pretty famous people.
The list includes important war heroes and
political leaders. George Washington was
even on the list because he was a slave owner!
So the New Orleans school board renamed
George Washington Elementary for Dr.
Charles Richard Drew, a famous African-
American surgeon.
But some people think this is going too far.
They agree schools shouldn’t support things
like slavery. But they also think that people
like George Washington deserve to be
remembered. After all, they say, he did make
major contributions to our country.
How do you feel? Should all schools named
for slave owners be renamed?
We should not honor
anyone who owned a
slave.
If a school is named
after a person who owned a slave, the
name should be changed.
It doesn’t
matter who it is.
Naming schools after
slave owners sends a terrible message
to kids.
It tells them that people today
don’t care about the pain that some of
our American ancestors suffered in
slavery.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should schools named for slave
owners be renamed?
44
No one’s supporting
slavery by naming a school
after George Washington.
He was a slave owner, and that was
wrong.
But he was also our first
president and the leader of the
American Revolution.
That’s what
people are honoring when they name a
school after him.
Schools should teach
kids about the horror of slavery in social
studies classes.
They shouldn’t worry
about changing school names.
Many schools named after slave owners are changing their names. Do you think
this is a good idea?
Talk About It: Why do you think some people may feel strongly about this issue?
How do you feel about it? Share it with others in your class.
I
Your Turn!
58
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
octors can now save lives by temporarily
transplanting pig organs into human bodies.
Pigs’ organs are similar in size and weight to
human organs. That’s why they function well
in humans. Companies are now even cloning
pigs for this purpose. The pig clones were
developed for organs that are compatible
with human bodies. Within the next year,
there may even be a permanent pig-to-human
organ transplant!
But some people say we shouldn’t pursue
these transplants. They fear the pigs’ organs
could introduce new diseases to humans.
Many people also think that killing animals
for their organs is a violation of animals’
rights.
People in favor of the transplants say that
the risks for disease are minimal. They also
claim that animal rights are just not important
when a human being is dying.
What do you think? Should doctors put
pigs’ organs in human bodies?
This is a no-brainer!
There are 180,000 people
worldwide waiting for
organ transplants.
Many of these people
will die waiting for an organ.
If pig
organs were used, many more lives
would be saved.
We can’t let skeptics
and animal rights advocates hold us
back. Scientists should keep working
hard to develop better transplanting
procedures.
It’s a matter of life and
death.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should doctors transplant pigs’
organs into human bodies?
45
Humans might get
deadly viruses from pig-
organ transplants.
Some
scientists think that diseases like Mad
Cow Disease could come into the
human population through contact with
animals.
Who knows what kinds of new
diseases pigs could give us? Anyway,
animals are not simply tools to be used
and abused as humans see fit.
They have
rights too.
Putting animals’ organs in
human bodies should not be allowed!
Some people think doctors should use pigs’ organs to save human lives. Others
think this is a bad idea.What do you think?
Talk About It: If someone you know needed a transplant, how would you feel about
the use of pigs’ organs.
D
Your Turn!
59
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hese days, more and more women are join-
ing the military. There are nearly 200,000
women already enlisted. Women in the mili-
tary can do almost anything, including flying
combat planes. The only jobs women are
excluded from are ground combat and sub-
marine duty.
Even so, the issue of women in the military
is far from settled. In the marines, men and
women are separated during basic training.
Recently, a panel appointed by Defense
Secretary William S. Cohen proposed
expanding this policy. The panel wants to
separate men and women in the army, navy,
and air force training programs as well.
Some people believe that separating men
and women during training makes them better
soldiers. They also say it reduces problems
like sexual harassment. But other people say
that separating men and women shows that
women are not being treated equally.
What do you think? Should male and
female military training be separate?
Face facts! Men and
women are different.
Separating them during
basic training is a good idea.
If men and
women are separated, they won’t
become involved with each other
romantically.
And bigger problems like
sexual harassment would be reduced to
zero.
With separate training, the
military can focus on preparing recruits
for battle rather than baby-sitting them.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should male and female training
in the military be separate?
46
We live in a society
where men and women
are equal.
Separating men
and women during basic training totally
contradicts that.
If they don’t train
together, how will men and women
learn to work together? Segregating
men and women would be a definite
step backwards.
Besides, hasn’t our
nation already learned that separate is
not equal?
Some people think that men and women in the armed services should be trained
separately. Others say they should be trained together.What do you think?
Write Now: Why does separate training make sense? Why might it not be a good
idea?
T
Your Turn!
60
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
hese days, people are still working hard to
make sure men and women are treated equal-
ly. It’s true that the United States has laws to
protect that equality. But sometimes those
laws aren’t enough. This is especially true in
American schools. A 1992 study showed that
schools consistently shortchange girls. Girls
are less active in school politics than boys.
They participate in sports less than boys do.
And they achieve less in school.
But in some parts of the United States, the
opposite is true. In several public schools, the
class president, the captain of the soccer team,
and even the editor of the yearbook are all
girls. How did this happen? After the 1992
study, several states started all-girls schools.
Supporters of these schools say this type of
environment works. They say these schools
ensure that girls have plenty of opportunities.
Opponents say that all-girls schools give a
false impression of what the real world is
like.
What do you think? Should girls have their
own schools?
All-girls schools are a
great idea.
There’s
scientific proof that
teachers pay more attention to boys
than to girls.
With no boys around, girls
get the attention they deserve.
And it’s
easier for them to participate in school
activities.
Plus, in single-sex schools girls
are free from social pressures and can
concentrate on learning.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should girls have
their own schools?
47
This is a rotten idea.
It’s
true that girls aren’t
always treated fairly.
And
that has to change.
But sexism is not
going to go away just by having all-girls
schools.
Girls should be exposed to the
pressures they will face in the real
world.
That’s the only way they’ll learn
to deal with challenges.
If girls don’t go
to school with boys, they’re not going to
be prepared for real life when they
graduate.
Some people say girls should have their own schools. Others say they ought to be
educated with boys.What do you think?
Find Out More: Take a poll in your class. How many are in favor? How many are
against?
T
Your Turn!
61
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
cross the country, schools are beefing up
their security. They want to make sure that no
one’s bringing anything dangerous to
school—especially guns.
But some schools in the United States
actually own guns, and keep them in their
buildings. What’s more, they let students use
them! How come? Believe it or not, many
schools have riflery teams. The teams learn to
use the guns at school, and practice shooting
rifles on school grounds.
For some teams, however, shooting practice
is over for good. Many of the schools that
have riflery are now banning it. People like
Chicago Schools Chief Paul Vallas say that
riflery sends a mixed message to kids.
Schools tell kids that gun violence is wrong,
but then schools teach kids how to shoot.
Other people think it’s unfair to ban a safe
sport that many kids enjoy. They say riflery
should be treated like any other activity.
What do you think? Should schools ban
rifle teams?
Guns have no place at
school! It doesn’t matter
what they’re for.
You can’t
teach kids not to play with guns one day,
and then let them use them the next.
And what if a dangerous person signs up
for riflery? Is it a good idea to teach
this person how to use a gun? Riflery
can’t be treated like “any other sport.”
What makes it different? Hello! It
involves dangerous weapons!
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should kids learn riflery in schools?
48
The right to bear arms
is protected by the
constitution.
No one has
the power to violate that right.
It’s that
simple.
Anyway, the problem of violence
doesn’t have anything to do with guns.
It has to do with kids who have serious
mental problems.
People should spend
more time addressing the needs of kids
rather than trying to ban a healthy and
exciting activity.
Some people say guns have no place at schools. Others say that riflery should be
treated like any other sport.What do you think?
Write Now: Write a paragraph that explains your feelings about riflery.
A
Your Turn!
62
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
et’s say you have a friend in a far-off coun-
try. One day she sends you a letter that says
she can’t write to you anymore. At first you
don’t understand. But as you continue to
read, you discover the reason. A war has bro-
ken out in her country.
This is the worst news you’ve ever received.
You’re worried for your friend. You start
watching the news every night to see what’s
happening. It’s the most horrifying thing
you’ve ever seen. Then one day the news
reports something completely unbelievable.
The United States has decided not to help stop
the war. The government says it’s none of our
business. How do you feel?
Many people would argue this decision
makes sense. These people say that the United
States just can’t solve everyone else’s
problems. Others say the United States must
help those in need, no matter what. They say
we just can’t abandon people.
What do you think? Should the United
States be the world’s police force?
People need our help.
All you have to do is turn
on the television to see
people who are starving or getting shot
at.
The United States is the richest
country in the world.
It has more
money and a bigger military than any
other country.
There are all sorts of
things we can do to solve the world’s
problems.
To sit back and do nothing is
unthinkable.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should the United States be
the world’s police force?
49
We can’t even solve our
own problems.
How can
we help other people?
Our country needs new schools, new
hospitals, and a bigger police force.
We
can’t pour money into other countries
until we’ve taken care of these things
first.
Anyway, the world has too many
problems to solve.
If we tried to fix
everyone else’s problems we’d be broke
in a week.
Some people say the United States should help other nations. Others say that
the world’s problems are none of our business.What do you think?
Talk About It: Why might some countries need help from the United States?
L
Your Turn!
63
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources
et’s say you really want a new portable CD
player but you don’t quite have the cash.
Here’s the good news: Someone agrees to
lend you the money. But there’s a catch. You
have to pay them back extra. And the longer
you take to pay them back, the more you’ll
owe. You could even end up owing double
what you borrowed! Would you take the
loan? Believe it or not, teens all across
America are getting loans just like this. How?
That’s how credit cards work!
Credit cards can be useful. If you don’t
have the money for something you need, you
can buy it anyway. You’ll just pay for it later.
But this convenience has a price. If you plan
to buy now and pay later, you’ll be paying
very high interest. That means you’ll be
paying extra for anything you buy.
Many people think credit cards are too
much responsibility for teens. Others think
that they should have the same rights as any
other consumer.
What do you think? Should teens be
allowed to have their own credit cards?
Credit cards let you do
all sorts of things.
They
make it easy to buy things
over the phone.
If they get lost or
stolen, they’re easier to replace than
cash.
Plus, a credit card keeps track of
your spending—it’s a good way to stay
on budget.
And if you’re careful, you’ll
never have to pay interest.
Credit cards
are useful in today’s world and teens
should have them too.
D
e
b
a
t
e
P
r
o
m
p
t
Should teens have their
own credit cards?
50
It’s hard enough for
adults to keep track of
their credit card.
Many
adults get in big trouble with their
credit-card debts.
It would only be
worse for teens.
Most kids don’t make
enough money to pay back their debt
on time.
Teach kids about savings and
buying things with the money they
have—not the money they’re going to
have.
Some say credit cards are just for adults. Others think that kids should get them
too.What do you think?
Write Now: Make a list of good reasons for teens to have credit cards. Make a
second list of reasons why it is a bad idea.
L
Your Turn!
64
50 Debate Prompts for Kids © Daley & Dahlie, Scholastic Teaching Resources